Testing Foundations of Biological Scaling Theory Using Automated Measurements of Vascular Networks
Mitchell G Newberry, Daniel B Ennis, Van M Savage

TL;DR
This study introduces automated software for measuring vascular networks in vivo, revealing discrepancies in scaling exponents and challenging existing biological scaling theories based on empirical data from human subjects.
Contribution
The paper presents a novel, non-invasive method for extracting detailed vascular measurements from MRI data, enabling more accurate testing of biological scaling theories.
Findings
Methods often disagree on length scaling exponents
Vessel radius measurements align better with theoretical predictions
Results highlight complexities in vascular network structures
Abstract
Scientists have long sought to understand how vascular networks supply blood and oxygen to cells throughout the body. Recent work focuses on principles that constrain how vessel size changes through branching generations from the aorta to capillaries and uses scaling exponents to quantify these changes. Prominent scaling theories predict that combinations of these exponents explain how metabolic, growth, and other biological rates vary with body size. Nevertheless, direct measurements of individual vessel segments have been limited because existing techniques for measuring vasculature are invasive, time consuming, and technically difficult. We developed software that extracts the length, radius, and connectivity of in vivo vessels from contrast-enhanced 3D Magnetic Resonance Angiography. Using data from 20 human subjects, we calculated scaling exponents by four methods--two derived from…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
