Forecasting sensitivity on tilt of power spectrum of primordial gravitational waves after Planck satellite
Qing-Guo Huang, Sai Wang, Wen Zhao

TL;DR
This paper forecasts the future sensitivity of various CMB experiments to the tilt of the primordial gravitational wave spectrum, considering foreground contamination, and finds that satellite experiments can measure the tilt with reasonable precision.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive Fisher matrix forecast for the sensitivity of multiple upcoming CMB experiments to the tensor tilt, accounting for foregrounds and current constraints.
Findings
Satellite experiments can measure the tensor tilt with $\sigma_{n_t}\lesssim0.1$ for $r\gtrsim2 imes10^{-3}$.
Ground-based and balloon experiments have worse sensitivity to the tensor tilt.
Current constraints prevent testing the inflationary consistency relation $n_t=-r/8$ with these experiments.
Abstract
By taking into account the contamination of foreground radiations, we employ the Fisher matrix to forecast the future sensitivity on the tilt of power spectrum of primordial tensor perturbations for several ground-based (AdvACT, CLASS, Keck/BICEP3, Simons Array, SPT-3G), balloon-borne (EBEX, Spider) and satellite (CMBPol, COrE, LiteBIRD) experiments of B-mode polarizations. For the fiducial model , our results show that the satellite experiments give good sensitivity on the tensor tilt to the level for , while the ground-based and balloon-borne experiments give worse sensitivity. By considering the BICEP2/Keck Array and Planck (BKP) constraint on the tensor-to-scalar ratio , we see that it is impossible for these experiments to test the consistency relation in the canonical single-field slow-roll inflation…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
