Deep radio imaging of 47 Tuc identifies the peculiar X-ray source X9 as a new black hole candidate
J. C. A. Miller-Jones (1), J. Strader (2), C. O. Heinke (3,4), T. J., Maccarone (5), M. van den Berg (6, 7), C. Knigge (8), L. Chomiuk (2), E., Noyola (9), T. D. Russell (1), A. C. Seth (10), G. R. Sivakoff (3) ((1), ICRAR-Curtin, (2) Michigan State, (3) Alberta, (4) MPIfR

TL;DR
This study presents radio and X-ray observations of the source X9 in 47 Tuc, suggesting it is a quiescent stellar-mass black hole binary based on its radio luminosity and spectral characteristics, marking a rare discovery in a globular cluster.
Contribution
The paper provides the first evidence linking X9 to a black hole candidate through radio detection and spectral analysis, challenging previous classifications as a cataclysmic variable.
Findings
Radio emission consistent with black hole accretion
X9's position on the black hole radio/X-ray correlation
Potential ultracompact binary system with a short orbital period
Abstract
We report the detection of steady radio emission from the known X-ray source X9 in the globular cluster 47 Tuc. With a double-peaked C IV emission line in its ultraviolet spectrum providing a clear signature of accretion, this source had been previously classified as a cataclysmic variable. In deep ATCA imaging from 2010 and 2013, we identified a steady radio source at both 5.5 and 9.0 GHz, with a radio spectral index (defined as ) of . Our measured flux density of microJy/beam at 5.5 GHz implies a radio luminosity () of 5.8e27 erg/s, significantly higher than any previous radio detection of an accreting white dwarf. Transitional millisecond pulsars, which have the highest radio-to-X-ray flux ratios among accreting neutron stars (still a factor of a few below accreting black holes at the same X-ray luminosity), show…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
