Multi-photon entanglement in high dimensions
Mehul Malik, Manuel Erhard, Marcus Huber, Mario Krenn, Robert Fickler,, and Anton Zeilinger

TL;DR
This paper reports the first experimental creation of multi-photon entangled states with both the number of particles and their dimensions exceeding two, revealing complex asymmetric entanglement structures useful for advanced quantum communication.
Contribution
The authors demonstrate a novel method to generate high-dimensional, multi-particle entangled states with asymmetric structures, expanding the capabilities of quantum entanglement beyond previous two-dimensional, two-particle systems.
Findings
Successfully generated multi-photon entangled states with high dimensions and multiple particles.
Demonstrated asymmetric entanglement structure with different dimensional spaces for photons.
Proposed a layered quantum cryptographic protocol utilizing these states.
Abstract
Entanglement lies at the heart of quantum mechanics as a fundamental tool for testing its deep rift with classical physics, while also providing a key resource for quantum technologies such as quantum computation and cryptography. In 1987 Greenberger, Horne, and Zeilinger realized that the entanglement of more than two particles implies a non-statistical conflict between local realism and quantum mechanics. The resulting predictions were experimentally confirmed by entangling three photons in their polarization. Experimental efforts since have singularly focused on increasing the number of particles entangled, while remaining in a two-dimensional space for each particle. Here we show the experimental generation of the first multi-photon entangled state where both the number of particles and the number of dimensions are greater than two. Interestingly, our state exhibits an…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
