Linear and Circular polarization in ultra-relativistic synchrotron sources - implications to GRB afterglows
Lara Nava, Ehud Nakar, Tsvi Piran

TL;DR
This paper extends synchrotron polarization theory to relativistic jets, analyzing linear and circular polarization in GRB afterglows, and concludes that observed high circular polarization cannot originate from optically thin synchrotron emission.
Contribution
It develops a comprehensive model for polarization in relativistic jets, including various magnetic field and electron distribution configurations, and assesses their implications for GRB observations.
Findings
High circular polarization in GRB afterglows is unlikely from intrinsic synchrotron emission.
The polarization depends strongly on magnetic field geometry and electron pitch-angle distribution.
Observed polarization levels challenge the simple synchrotron emission models.
Abstract
Polarization measurements from relativistic outflows are a valuable tool to probe the geometry of the emission region and the microphysics of the particle distribution. Indeed, the polarization level depends on: (i) the local magnetic field orientation, (ii) the geometry of the emitting region with respect to the line of sight, and (iii) the electron pitch-angle distribution. Here we consider optically thin synchrotron emission and we extend the theory of circular polarization from a point source to an extended radially expanding relativistic jet. We present numerical estimates for both linear and circular polarization in such systems. We consider different configurations of the magnetic field, spherical and jetted outflows, isotropic and anisotropic pitch-angle distributions, and outline the difficulty in obtaining the reported high level of circular polarization observed in the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
