Modelling time evolving interactions in networks through a non stationary extension of stochastic block models

TL;DR

This paper extends the stochastic block model to account for non-stationary, time-evolving interactions in networks by partitioning the time horizon and clustering nodes and time intervals simultaneously, demonstrated on real conference data.

Contribution

It introduces a non-stationary extension of SBM that models time-varying interactions and jointly clusters nodes and time intervals, overcoming the stationary assumption of traditional SBMs.

Findings

Successfully modeled interactions during a conference day

Recovered social gathering times like coffee breaks

Applicable to real-world network data

Abstract

In this paper, we focus on the stochastic block model (SBM),a probabilistic tool describing interactions between nodes of a network using latent clusters. The SBM assumes that the networkhas a stationary structure, in which connections of time varying intensity are not taken into account. In other words, interactions between two groups are forced to have the same features during the whole observation time. To overcome this limitation,we propose a partition of the whole time horizon, in which interactions are observed, and develop a non stationary extension of the SBM,allowing to simultaneously cluster the nodes in a network along with fixed time intervals in which the interactions take place. The number of clusters (K for nodes, D for time intervals) as well as the class memberships are finallyobtained through maximizing the complete-data integrated likelihood by means of a greedy search approach. After showing that the model works properly with simulated data, we focus on a real data set. We thus consider the three days ACM Hypertext conference held in Turin,June 29th - July 1st 2009. Proximity interactions between attendees during the first day are modelled and an interestingclustering of the daily hours is finally obtained, with times of social gathering (e.g. coffee breaks) recovered by the approach. Applications to large networks are limited due to the computational complexity of the greedy search which is dominated bythe number $K\_{max}$ and $D\_{max}$ of clusters used in the initialization. Therefore,advanced clustering tools are considered to reduce the number of clusters expected in the data, making the greedy search applicable to large networks.