Are the double Fermi arcs of Dirac semimetals topologically protected?
Mehdi Kargarian, Mohit Randeria, Yuan-Ming Lu

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that the surface states of Dirac semimetals are generally not topologically protected, except on specific planes, and these states can deform into Fermi pockets or merge with bulk states as conditions change.
Contribution
It provides a theoretical analysis showing the lack of topological protection for Dirac semimetal surface states, contrasting with Weyl semimetals, using minimal models and K-theory.
Findings
Surface states in DSMs are protected only on time-reversal-invariant planes.
Double Fermi arcs can deform into Fermi pockets.
Predictions made for doping effects on surface states.
Abstract
Motivated by recent experiments probing anomalous surface states of Dirac semimetals (DSMs) NaBi and CdAs, we raise the question posed in the title. We find that, in marked contrast to Weyl semimetals, the gapless surface states of DSMs are not topologically protected in general, except on time-reversal-invariant planes of surface Brillouin zone. We first demonstrate this in a minimal -band model with a pair of Dirac nodes at , where gapless states on the side surfaces are protected only near . We then validate our conclusions about the absence of a topological invariant protecting double Fermi arcs in DSMs using a K-theory analysis for space groups of NaBi and CdAs. Generically, the arcs deform into a Fermi pocket, similar to {{the surface states of a topological insulator (TI), and this can merge into the}} projection of bulk…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
