IMF Lending and Economic Growth: An Empirical Analysis of Ukraine
Roman Kononenko

TL;DR
This paper analyzes the causal relationship between IMF lending and Ukraine's economic growth from 1991 to 2010, finding short-term negative effects but potential long-term benefits if funds are used for reforms.
Contribution
It applies VAR and VEC methodologies to empirically assess the impact of IMF lending on Ukraine's growth, highlighting policy implications.
Findings
IMF lending negatively affects short-term growth
Long-term growth may improve with proper fund utilization
Empirical evidence supports reform-focused policy
Abstract
This study uses Vector Autoregression (VAR) Methodology as well as Vector Error Correction (VEC) Methodology to examine the existence and direction of causality between economic growth and IMF lending for Ukraine. The paper examines the IMF lending data for the period of 1991-2010. Robust empirical analysis indicates that IMF lending has a negative effect of on Ukraine's economic growth in the short term. Policy implications of this finding are that, despite short-run decline in economic growth, IMF lending can result in a long-run sustainable growth for Ukraine. For this, policymakers need to ensure that fund's money are used not only to cover budget's deficit, but also to finance institutional reforms.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsInternational Development and Aid · Economic Growth and Development · Natural Resources and Economic Development
