Does the obscured AGN fraction really depend on luminosity?
Sergey Sazonov, Eugene Churazov, Roman Krivonos

TL;DR
This study investigates whether the observed decrease in obscured AGN fraction with luminosity is intrinsic or due to observational biases, using a sample and modeling biases to estimate the true obscured fraction.
Contribution
It demonstrates that observational biases significantly affect the perceived luminosity dependence of obscured AGN fraction and provides corrected estimates of the intrinsic obscured fraction.
Findings
Intrinsic obscured fraction decreases with luminosity.
Biases can cause an apparent decline even if the intrinsic fraction is constant.
The intrinsic torus opening angle varies with luminosity.
Abstract
We use a sample of 151 local non-blazar AGN selected from the INTEGRAL all-sky hard X-ray survey to investigate if the observed declining trend of the fraction of obscured (i.e. showing X-ray absorption) AGN with increasing luminosity is mostly an intrinsic or selection effect. Using a torus-obscuration model, we demonstrate that in addition to negative bias, due to absorption in the torus, in finding obscured AGN in hard X-ray flux limited surveys, there is also positive bias in finding unobscured AGN, due to Compton reflection in the torus. These biases can be even stronger taking into account plausible intrinsic collimation of hard X-ray emission along the axis of the obscuring torus. Given the AGN luminosity function, which steepens at high luminosities, these observational biases lead to a decreasing observed fraction of obscured AGN with increasing luminosity even if this fraction…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
