The Poker-Litigation Game
Enrique Guerra-Pujol
TL;DR
This paper introduces a novel game-theoretic model of litigation as a poker game, deriving optimal strategies and providing new insights into legal strategy dynamics.
Contribution
It is the first to formally model litigation as a poker game, expanding the application of game theory to legal processes.
Findings
Derived the optimal strategy for the poker-litigation game
Provided a new perspective on litigation as a strategic poker game
Enhanced understanding of legal decision-making through game theory
Abstract
Is litigation a serious search for truth or simply a game of skill or luck? Although the process of litigation has been modeled as a Prisoner's Dilemma, as a War of Attrition, as a Game of Chicken and even as a simple coin toss, no one has formally modeled litigation as a game of poker. This paper is the first to do so. We present a simple "poker-litigation game" and find the optimal strategy for playing this game.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsArtificial Intelligence in Games · Game Theory and Applications · Game Theory and Voting Systems