Multiple Conclusion Rules in Logics with the Disjunction Property
Alex Citkin

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that in certain intermediate and modal logics with the disjunction property, bases of admissible rules and m-rules are interconvertible, simplifying the understanding of their rule structures.
Contribution
It establishes the equivalence between bases of admissible rules and m-rules in a wide class of logics with the disjunction property, including positive, Johansson, and modal logics.
Findings
Bases of admissible rules can be reduced to bases of admissible m-rules.
Bases of admissible m-rules can be reduced to bases of admissible rules.
Results apply to various logics including positive, Johansson, and S4 extensions.
Abstract
We prove that for the intermediate logics with the disjunction property any basis of admissible rules can be reduced to a basis of admissible m-rules (multiple-conclusion rules), and every basis of admissible m-rules can be reduced to a basis of admissible rules. These results can be generalized to a broad class of logics including positive logic and its extensions, Johansson logic, normal extensions of S4, n-transitive logics and intuitionistic modal logics.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
