Anatomy of the Higgs fits: a first guide to statistical treatments of the theoretical uncertainties
Sylvain Fichet, Gr\'egory Moreau

TL;DR
This paper provides a comprehensive statistical framework for incorporating theoretical uncertainties into Higgs boson coupling fits, analyzing Bayesian and frequentist methods, and exploring the impact on Standard Model predictions with LHC data.
Contribution
It introduces a unified formalism for treating theoretical uncertainties in Higgs fits, including analytical marginal likelihoods, correlation effects, and bias approaches, advancing the statistical analysis of Higgs data.
Findings
Theoretical uncertainties significantly influence Higgs coupling fit regions.
Gaussian priors naturally emerge from error combination methods.
Standard Model predictions are consistent within 68% or 95% confidence levels depending on the statistical approach.
Abstract
The studies of the Higgs boson couplings based on the recent and upcoming LHC data open up a new window on physics beyond the Standard Model. In this paper, we propose a statistical guide to the consistent treatment of the theoretical uncertainties entering the Higgs rate fits. Both the Bayesian and frequentist approaches are systematically analysed in a unified formalism. We present analytical expressions for the marginal likelihoods, useful to implement simultaneously the experimental and theoretical uncertainties. We review the various origins of the theoretical errors (QCD, EFT, PDF, production mode contamination...). All these individual uncertainties are thoroughly combined with the help of moment-based considerations. The theoretical correlations among Higgs detection channels appear to affect the location and size of the best-fit regions in the space of Higgs couplings. We…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
