A universal structural and star-forming relation since $z\sim3$: connecting compact star-forming and quiescent galaxies
G. Barro, S. M. Faber, D. C. Koo, A. Dekel, J. J. Fang, J. R. Trump,, P. G. Perez-Gonzalez, C. Pacifici, J. R. Primack, R. S. Somerville, H. Yan,, Y. Guo, F. Liu, D. Ceverino, D. D. Kocevski, E. McGrath

TL;DR
This study reveals that both star-forming and quiescent galaxies follow nearly constant structural relations since z~3, with dense cores in SFGs being key to quenching and galaxy evolution.
Contribution
It identifies a universal structural relation for galaxies since z~3 and links core growth in SFGs to the quenching process, introducing the Sigma-MS framework.
Findings
Structural relations remain nearly constant over time.
Dense cores in SFGs are essential for quenching.
A threshold density of 9.5 M_sun/kpc^2 effectively identifies quenching progenitors.
Abstract
We study the evolution of the core (r<1 kpc) and effective (r<r_e) stellar-mass surface densities, in star-forming and quiescent galaxies. Since z=3, both populations occupy distinct, linear relations in log(Sigma_e) and log(Sigma_1) vs. log(M). These structural relations exhibit slopes and scatter that remain almost constant with time while their normalizations decline. For SFGs, the normalization declines by less than a factor of 2 from z=3, in both Sigma_e and Sigma_1. Such mild declines suggest that SFGs build dense cores by growing along these relations. We define this evolution as the structural main sequence (Sigma-MS). Quiescent galaxies follow different relations (Sigma^Q_e, Sigma^Q_1) off the Sigma-MS by having higher densities than SFGs of the same mass and redshift. The normalization of Sigma^Q_e declines by a factor of 10 since z=3, but only a factor of 2 in Sigma^Q_1.…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
