Some Triangulated Surfaces without Balanced Splitting
Vincent Despr\'e, Francis Lazarus

TL;DR
This paper investigates splitting cycles in triangulated surfaces, confirming their existence for an infinite family of graphs but providing counterexamples to a stronger conjecture about all possible cycle types.
Contribution
It proves the existence of splitting cycles in certain triangulations and refutes a broader conjecture about their types in all cases.
Findings
Confirmed conjecture for an infinite family of triangulations
Provided counterexamples to the stronger conjecture
Showed not all cycle types are necessarily present
Abstract
Let G be the graph of a triangulated surface of genus . A cycle of G is splitting if it cuts into two components, neither of which is homeomorphic to a disk. A splitting cycle has type k if the corresponding components have genera k and g-k. It was conjectured that G contains a splitting cycle (Barnette '1982). We confirm this conjecture for an infinite family of triangulations by complete graphs but give counter-examples to a stronger conjecture (Mohar and Thomassen '2001) claiming that G should contain splitting cycles of every possible type.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Combinatorial Mathematics · Computational Geometry and Mesh Generation · Commutative Algebra and Its Applications
