DiffSum - A Simple Post-Election Risk-Limiting Audit
Ronald L. Rivest

TL;DR
DiffSum is a straightforward post-election audit method that sequentially samples ballots until a statistical condition confirms the reported winner, offering a simple and effective risk-limiting audit for two-candidate elections.
Contribution
This paper introduces DiffSum, a new simple sequential ballot-polling audit method with error bounds, improving ease of implementation over existing techniques.
Findings
DiffSum effectively controls error rates through simulations.
Compared to Bravo, DiffSum offers a simpler implementation.
DiffSum provides reliable risk-limiting properties for two-candidate elections.
Abstract
This paper presents DiffSum, a simple post-election risk-limiting ballot-polling audit for two-candidate plurality elections. DiffSum sequentially draws ballots (without replacement) until the numbers , , of votes for candidates , satisfies and , where is the reported winner and is a suitably chosen constant. Bounds on the error rate (chance of approving an incorrect election outcome) are obtained via simulations. The method is compared with the Bravo method of Lindeman, Stark, and Yates.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGame Theory and Voting Systems · Internet Traffic Analysis and Secure E-voting · Electoral Systems and Political Participation
