Towards Tight Bounds for the Streaming Set Cover Problem

TL;DR

This paper introduces a new multi-pass streaming algorithm for the Set Cover problem with improved space complexity and tight bounds, also exploring geometric variants and space limitations for one-pass algorithms.

Contribution

It presents a near-optimal multi-pass streaming algorithm for Set Cover with tight tradeoffs, extends results to geometric cases, and establishes space lower bounds for one-pass algorithms.

Findings

New $O(1/\delta)$-pass algorithm with sub-linear space and logarithmic approximation.

Proved tightness of the pass-space tradeoff for exact set cover.

Showed linear space lower bound for one-pass algorithms distinguishing small cover sizes.

Abstract

We consider the classic Set Cover problem in the data stream model. For $n$ elements and $m$ sets ($m\geq n$) we give a $O(1/\delta)$-pass algorithm with a strongly sub-linear $\tilde{O}(mn^{\delta})$ space and logarithmic approximation factor. This yields a significant improvement over the earlier algorithm of Demaine et al. [DIMV14] that uses exponentially larger number of passes. We complement this result by showing that the tradeoff between the number of passes and space exhibited by our algorithm is tight, at least when the approximation factor is equal to $1$. Specifically, we show that any algorithm that computes set cover exactly using $({1 \over 2\delta}-1)$ passes must use $\tilde{\Omega}(mn^{\delta})$ space in the regime of $m=O(n)$. Furthermore, we consider the problem in the geometric setting where the elements are points in $\mathbb{R}^2$ and sets are either discs, axis-parallel rectangles, or fat triangles in the plane, and show that our algorithm (with a slight modification) uses the optimal $\tilde{O}(n)$ space to find a logarithmic approximation in $O(1/\delta)$ passes. Finally, we show that any randomized one-pass algorithm that distinguishes between covers of size 2 and 3 must use a linear (i.e., $\Omega(mn)$) amount of space. This is the first result showing that a randomized, approximate algorithm cannot achieve a space bound that is sublinear in the input size. This indicates that using multiple passes might be necessary in order to achieve sub-linear space bounds for this problem while guaranteeing small approximation factors.