The Controversial Star-Formation History and Helium Enrichment of the Milky Way Bulge
David M. Nataf

TL;DR
The paper reviews conflicting evidence on the Milky Way bulge's star-formation history, highlighting discrepancies between observational data suggesting intermediate ages and models indicating predominantly old stars, with helium-enrichment proposed as a potential resolution.
Contribution
It critically examines various observational and theoretical studies, proposing helium-enrichment as a key factor to reconcile conflicting age estimates of the bulge stars.
Findings
Spectroscopic data suggest a significant intermediate-age population.
Photometric studies indicate mostly old stars with ages over 8 Gyr.
Helium-enrichment could resolve discrepancies in age estimates.
Abstract
The stellar population of the Milky Way bulge is thoroughly studied, with a plethora of measurements from virtually the full suite of instruments available to astronomers. It is thus perhaps surprising that alongside well-established results lies some substantial uncertainty in its star-formation history. Cosmological models predict the bulge to host the Galaxy's oldest stars for [Fe/H], and this is demonstrated by RR Lyrae stars and globular cluster observations. There is consensus that bulge stars with [Fe/H] are older than Gyr. However, at super-solar metallicity, there is a substantial unresolved discrepancy. Data from spectroscopic measurements of the main-sequence turnoff and subgiant branch, the abundances of asymptotic giant branch stars, the period distribution of Mira variables, the chemistry and central-star masses of planetary nebulae,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
