Measuring user influence on Twitter: A survey
Fabi\'an Riquelme, Pablo Gonz\'alez-Cantergiani

TL;DR
This survey reviews various measures of user influence on Twitter, analyzing their computational efficiency, relevance classification, and diversity, including simple metrics, PageRank-based, content-focused, and predictive models.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive classification and comparison of Twitter influence measures, highlighting their diversity and computational aspects.
Findings
Many influence measures are based on PageRank and activity metrics.
Measures vary in complexity from simple API metrics to complex models.
The survey identifies key aspects affecting influence measurement accuracy.
Abstract
Centrality is one of the most studied concepts in social network analysis. There is a huge literature regarding centrality measures, as ways to identify the most relevant users in a social network. The challenge is to find measures that can be computed efficiently, and that can be able to classify the users according to relevance criteria as close as possible to reality. We address this problem in the context of the Twitter network, an online social networking service with millions of users and an impressive flow of messages that are published and spread daily by interactions between users. Twitter has different types of users, but the greatest utility lies in finding the most influential ones. The purpose of this article is to collect and classify the different Twitter influence measures that exist so far in literature. These measures are very diverse. Some are based on simple metrics…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
