Electromagnetic emission from long-lived binary neutron star merger remnants I: formulation of the problem
Daniel M. Siegel, Riccardo Ciolfi

TL;DR
This paper develops a comprehensive model to simulate electromagnetic emissions from long-lived neutron star remnants after binary neutron star mergers, bridging the gap between simulations and observable afterglows, and considering various collapse scenarios.
Contribution
It introduces a coupled differential equations framework that predicts EM emission from long-lived neutron star remnants, incorporating collapse timing and radiative processes, based on initial merger data.
Findings
Model can predict electromagnetic signatures of long-lived neutron star remnants.
Framework accommodates different collapse scenarios and prompt SGRB emissions.
Enhances understanding of post-merger electromagnetic signals for multimessenger astronomy.
Abstract
Binary neutron star (BNS) mergers are the leading model to explain the phenomenology of short gamma-ray bursts (SGRBs), which are among the most luminous explosions in the universe. Recent observations of long-lasting X-ray afterglows of SGRBs challenge standard paradigms and indicate that in a large fraction of events a long-lived neutron star (NS) may be formed rather than a black hole. Understanding the mechanisms underlying these afterglows is necessary in order to address the open questions concerning the nature of SGRB central engines. However, recent theoretical progress has been hampered by the fact that the timescales of interest for the afterglow emission are inaccessible to numerical relativity simulations. Here we present a detailed model to bridge the gap between numerical simulations of the merger process and the relevant timescales for the afterglows, assuming that the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
