Sub-kiloparsec Imaging of Cool Molecular Gas in Two Strongly Lensed Dusty, Star-Forming Galaxies
J. S. Spilker, M. Aravena, D. P. Marrone, M. Bethermin, M. S., Bothwell, J. E. Carlstrom, S. C. Chapman, J. D. Collier, C. de Breuck, C. D., Fassnacht, T. Galvin, A. H. Gonzalez, J. Gonzalez-Lopez, K. Grieve, Y., Hezaveh, J. Ma, M. Malkan, A. O'Brien, K. M. Rotermund

TL;DR
This study uses high-resolution gravitational lensing observations to analyze the structure and dynamics of molecular gas in two distant star-forming galaxies, revealing size differences between gas and dust emissions and implications for galaxy evolution.
Contribution
It provides the first spatially-resolved imaging of multiple CO lines in high-redshift lensed galaxies, demonstrating size differences between gas and dust and constraining the CO-H2 conversion factor.
Findings
Cold molecular gas has a larger half-light radius than dust emission.
Size differences impact magnification estimates and gas mass calculations.
The CO-H2 conversion factor aligns with values for rapidly star-forming systems.
Abstract
We present spatially-resolved imaging obtained with the Australia Telescope Compact Array (ATCA) of three CO lines in two high-redshift gravitationally lensed dusty star-forming galaxies, discovered by the South Pole Telescope. Strong lensing allows us to probe the structure and dynamics of the molecular gas in these two objects, at z=2.78 and z=5.66, with effective source-plane resolution of less than 1kpc. We model the lensed emission from multiple CO transitions and the dust continuum in a consistent manner, finding that the cold molecular gas as traced by low-J CO always has a larger half-light radius than the 870um dust continuum emission. This size difference leads to up to 50% differences in the magnification factor for the cold gas compared to dust. In the z=2.78 galaxy, these CO observations confirm that the background source is undergoing a major merger, while the velocity…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
