The Depth-Restricted Rectilinear Steiner Arborescence Problem is NP-complete
Jens Ma{\ss}berg

TL;DR
This paper proves that a restricted version of the rectilinear Steiner arborescence problem, with depth constraints for terminals, remains NP-hard, highlighting its computational complexity.
Contribution
It introduces a depth-restricted variant of the rectilinear Steiner arborescence problem and proves its NP-hardness, extending understanding of its computational difficulty.
Findings
Depth-restricted problem is NP-hard.
Even with depth constraints, the problem remains computationally intractable.
The result extends NP-hardness to more restricted problem variants.
Abstract
In the rectilinear Steiner arborescence problem the task is to build a shortest rectilinear Steiner tree connecting a given root and a set of terminals which are placed in the plane such that all root-terminal-paths are shortest paths. This problem is known to be NP-hard. In this paper we consider a more restricted version of this problem. In our case we have a depth restrictions for every terminal . We are looking for a shortest binary rectilinear Steiner arborescence such that each terminal is at depth , that is, there are exactly Steiner points on the unique root--path is exactly . We prove that even this restricted version is NP-hard.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsVLSI and FPGA Design Techniques · VLSI and Analog Circuit Testing · Interconnection Networks and Systems
