A review of East Asian reports of aurorae and comets circa AD 775
Jesse Chapman (U Berkeley), Dagmar Neuhaeuser (Jena), Ralph Neuhaeuser, (U Jena), Mark Csikszentmihalyi (U Berkeley)

TL;DR
This paper critically reviews East Asian celestial records around AD 775, concluding most reported aurorae and phenomena are misinterpretations or misdated, and finds no strong evidence linking these events to the 14C variation in AD 774/5.
Contribution
It provides a detailed reassessment of historical East Asian records, clarifying the nature and dating of celestial events around AD 775 and challenging previous interpretations of aurorae linked to the 14C spike.
Findings
Most reported aurorae after AD 770 are misinterpretations or misdated.
No strong evidence of aurorae linked to the AD 774/5 14C variation.
Some aurorae likely observed in AD 762 and prior to AD 771.
Abstract
Given that a strong 14C variation in AD 775 has recently been suggested to be due to the largest solar flare ever recorded in history, it is relevant to investigate whether celestial events observed around that time may have been aurorae, possibly even very strong aurorae, or otherwise related to the 14C variation (e.g. a suggested comet impact with Earth's atmosphere). We critically review several celestial observations from AD 757 to the end of the 770s, most of which were previously considered to be true, and in some cases, strong aurorae; we discuss in detail the East Asian records and their wording. We conclude that probably none among the events after AD 770 was actually an aurora, including the event in AD 776 Jan, which was misdated for AD 774 or 775; the observed white qi phenomenon that happened "above the moon" in the south-east was most probably a halo effect near the full…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
