Spatial competition of the ground states in 1111 iron pnictides
G. Lang, L. Veyrat, U. Graefe, F. Hammerath, D. Paar, G. Behr, S., Wurmehl, and H.-J. Grafe

TL;DR
This study uses nuclear quadrupole resonance to map the phase diagram of 1111 iron pnictides, revealing how local charge regions influence magnetism and superconductivity, and proposing a nanoscopic competition model for their ground states.
Contribution
It provides a detailed phase diagram based on local charge distribution and introduces a nanoscopic competition model between magnetism and superconductivity in 1111 pnictides.
Findings
LD-like regions cause orthorhombicity and static magnetism.
Superconductivity is supported mainly by HD-like regions.
Static magnetism suppresses superconductivity through nanoscopic competition.
Abstract
Using nuclear quadrupole resonance, the phase diagram of 1111 FeAsOF (La, Ce, Sm) iron pnictides is constructed as a function of the local charge distribution in the paramagnetic state, which features low-doping-like (LD-like) and high-doping-like (HD-like) regions. Compounds based on magnetic rare earths (Ce, Sm) display a unified behavior, and comparison with La-based compounds reveals the detrimental role of static iron magnetism on superconductivity, as well as a qualitatively different evolution of the latter at high doping. It is found that the LD-like regions fully account for the orthorhombicity of the system, and are thus the origin of any static iron magnetism. Orthorhombicity and static magnetism are not hindered by superconductivity but limited by dilution effects, in agreement with 2D (respectively 3D) nearest-neighbor square lattice site…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsIron-based superconductors research
