Robustness of movement models: can models bridge the gap between temporal scales of data sets and behavioural processes?
Ulrike E. Schl\"agel, Mark A. Lewis

TL;DR
This paper introduces a mathematical framework to assess and improve the robustness of animal movement models across different temporal data resolutions, addressing challenges in data analysis and model applicability.
Contribution
It proposes a formal definition of robustness for movement models, enabling validation across varying temporal resolutions and incorporating approximate robustness concepts.
Findings
Exact robustness is rare in movement models.
Approximate robustness offers a practical alternative.
Framework applied successfully to resource selection models.
Abstract
Discrete-time random walks and their extensions are common tools for analyzing animal movement data. In these analyses, resolution of temporal discretization is a critical feature. Ideally, a model both mirrors the relevant temporal scale of the biological process of interest and matches the data sampling rate. Challenges arise when resolution of data is too coarse due to technological constraints, or when we wish to extrapolate results or compare results obtained from data with different resolutions. Drawing loosely on the concept of robustness in statistics, we propose a rigorous mathematical framework for studying movement models' robustness against changes in temporal resolution. In this framework, we define varying levels of robustness as formal model properties, focusing on random walk models with spatially-explicit component. With the new framework, we can investigate whether…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
