TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that higher-order aggregate networks provide more accurate measures of node importance in temporal networks than traditional static representations, revealing the impact of link order on centrality.
Contribution
It introduces a second-order aggregate network approach for better capturing temporal path-based centralities, improving analysis accuracy over static models.
Findings
Higher-order networks outperform static models in capturing true node centralities.
Static, time-aggregated analysis can misrepresent node importance.
Second-order centrality measures align more closely with actual temporal importance.
Abstract
Recent research on temporal networks has highlighted the limitations of a static network perspective for our understanding of complex systems with dynamic topologies. In particular, recent works have shown that i) the specific order in which links occur in real-world temporal networks affects causality structures and thus the evolution of dynamical processes, and ii) higher-order aggregate representations of temporal networks can be used to analytically study the effect of these order correlations on dynamical processes. In this article we analyze the effect of order correlations on path-based centrality measures in real-world temporal networks. Analyzing temporal equivalents of betweenness, closeness and reach centrality in six empirical temporal networks, we first show that an analysis of the commonly used static, time-aggregated representation can give misleading results about the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
