On the behavior of singularities at the $F$-pure threshold
Eric Canton, Daniel Hern\'andez, Karl Schwede, Emily Witt, Alessandro, De Stefani, Jack Jeffries, Zhibek Kadyrsizova, Robert Walker, George Whelan

TL;DR
This paper explores the relationship between the $F$-pure threshold and the log canonical threshold, providing examples of their differences, analyzing the $F$-signature function, and examining the behavior of test ideals in specific cases.
Contribution
It introduces new examples where the $F$-pure and log canonical thresholds differ without $p$ dividing the denominator, and studies the $F$-signature function's behavior in these contexts.
Findings
$F$-pure threshold and log canonical threshold can differ without $p$ dividing the denominator.
$F$-signature function behaves similarly when these thresholds coincide or share certain properties.
Test ideals can behave unexpectedly even when thresholds coincide.
Abstract
We provide a family of examples where the -pure threshold and the log canonical threshold of a polynomial are different, but where does not divide the denominator of the -pure threshold (compare with an example of \mustata-Takagi-Watanabe). We then study the -signature function in the case where either the -pure threshold and log canonical threshold coincide or where does not divide the denominator of the -pure threshold. We show that the -signature function behaves similarly in those two cases. Finally, we include an appendix which shows that the test ideal can still behave in surprising ways even when the -pure threshold and log canonical threshold coincide.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
