The 2003-4 multisite photometric campaign for the Beta Cephei and eclipsing star 16 (EN) Lacertae with an Appendix on 2 Andromedae, the variable comparison star
M. Jerzykiewicz, G. Handler, J. Daszynska-Daszkiewicz, A. Pigulski, E., Poretti, E. Rodriguez, P. J. Amado, Z. Kolaczkowski, K. Uytterhoeven, T. N., Dorokhova, N. I. Dorokhov, D. Lorenz, D. Zsuffa, S.-L. Kim, P.-O. Bourge, B., Acke, J. De Ridder, T. Verhoelst, R. Drummond

TL;DR
This study presents a comprehensive multisite photometric campaign on the variable star 16 Lacertae, analyzing pulsation modes, eclipse light curves, and long-term amplitude variations, providing new insights into stellar pulsation and binary characteristics.
Contribution
It offers detailed mode identification, amplitude ratio analysis, and long-term variation study of pulsations in 16 Lacertae, along with an analysis of the comparison star 2 Andromedae.
Findings
Mode l=4 is incompatible with observations.
Radial mode varies non-sinusoidally over 73 years.
The l=1 mode is a triplet with specific beat periods.
Abstract
A multisite photometric campaign for the Beta Cephei and eclipsing variable 16 Lacertae is reported. 749 h of high-quality differential photoelectric Stromgren, Johnson and Geneva time-series photometry were obtained with ten telescopes during 185 nights. After removing the pulsation contribution, an attempt was made to solve the resulting eclipse light curve by means of the computer program EBOP. Although a unique solution was not obtained, the range of solutions could be constrained by comparing computed positions of the secondary component in the Hertzsprung-Russell diagram with evolutionary tracks. For three high-amplitude pulsation modes, the uvy and the Geneva UBG amplitude ratios are derived and compared with the theoretical ones for spherical-harmonic degrees l <= 4. The highest degree, l = 4, is shown to be incompatible with the observations. One mode is found to be radial,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
