Termination of the magnetorotational instability via parasitic instabilities in core-collapse supernovae
Tomasz Rembiasz, Martin Obergaulinger, Pablo Cerd\'a-Dur\'an, Ewald, M\"uller, Miguel-\'Angel Aloy

TL;DR
This study investigates how parasitic instabilities, especially Kelvin-Helmholtz modes, terminate the magnetorotational instability in core-collapse supernovae, using high-resolution simulations to determine the maximum magnetic stress achievable.
Contribution
The paper provides high-accuracy simulations demonstrating that Kelvin-Helmholtz parasitic modes dominate MRI termination in protoneutron stars, confirming local stability analysis predictions.
Findings
Kelvin-Helmholtz modes dominate tearing modes at high Reynolds numbers.
High numerical resolution is essential for accurate MRI growth and termination modeling.
At least 8 grid zones per MRI channel are needed for ~10% growth rate accuracy.
Abstract
The magnetorotational instability (MRI) can be a powerful mechanism amplifying the magnetic field in core-collapse supernovae. Whether initially weak magnetic fields can be amplified by this instability to dynamically relevant strengths is still a matter of debate. One of the main uncertainties concerns the process that terminates the growth of the instability. Parasitic instabilities of both Kelvin-Helmholtz and tearing-mode type have been suggested to play a crucial role in this process, disrupting MRI channel flows and quenching magnetic field amplification. We perform two-dimensional and three-dimensional sheering-disc simulations of a differentially rotating protoneutron star layer in non-ideal magnetohydrodynamics with unprecedented high numerical accuracy, finding that Kelvin-Helmholtz parasitic modes dominate tearing modes in the regime of large hydrodynamic and magnetic…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
