The Optical Luminosity Function of Void Galaxies in the SDSS and ALFALFA Surveys

TL;DR

This study measures the galaxy luminosity function in different environments using SDSS and ALFALFA data, revealing environmental effects and selection biases on galaxy brightness distributions.

Contribution

It provides the first detailed comparison of optical luminosity functions for void and wall galaxies and examines the impact of surface brightness and HI selection effects.

Findings

Void galaxies have fainter characteristic magnitudes than wall galaxies.

The faint-end slope of the luminosity function is similar in voids and walls.

The ALFALFA HI-selected sample shows a non-Schechter shape with a dip and upturn.

Abstract

We measure the r-band galaxy luminosity function (LF) across environments over the redshift range 0<$z$<0.107 using the SDSS. We divide our sample into galaxies residing in large scale voids (void galaxies) and those residing in denser regions (wall galaxies). The best fitting Schechter parameters for void galaxies are: log$\Phi^*$= -3.40$\pm$0.03 log(Mpc$^{-3}$), $M^*$= -19.88$\pm$0.05, and $\alpha$=-1.20$\pm$0.02. For wall galaxies, the best fitting parameters are: log$\Phi^*$=-2.86$\pm$0.02 log(Mpc$^{-3}$), $M^*$=-20.80$\pm$0.03, and $\alpha$=-1.16$\pm$0.01. We find a shift in the characteristic magnitude, $M^*$, towards fainter magnitudes for void galaxies and find no significant difference between the faint-end slopes of the void and wall galaxy LFs. We investigate how low surface brightness selections effects can affect the galaxy LF. To attempt to examine a sample of galaxies that is relatively free of surface brightness selection effects, we compute the optical galaxy LF of galaxies detected by the blind HI survey, ALFALFA. We find that the global LF of the ALFALFA sample is not well fit by a Schechter function, because of the presence of a wide dip in the LF around $M_r$=-18 and an upturn at fainter magnitudes ($\alpha$~-1.47). We compare the HI selected r-band LF to various LFs of optically selected populations to determine where the HI selected optical LF obtains its shape. We find that sample selection plays a large role in determining the shape of the LF.