Planck intermediate results. XXXIX. The Planck list of high-redshift source candidates
Planck Collaboration: P. A. R. Ade, N. Aghanim, M. Arnaud, J. Aumont,, C. Baccigalupi, A. J. Banday, R. B. Barreiro, N. Bartolo, E. Battaner, K., Benabed, A. Benoit-L\'evy, J.-P. Bernard, M. Bersanelli, P. Bielewicz, A., Bonaldi, L. Bonavera, J. R. Bond, J. Borrill

TL;DR
This paper presents a new catalog of 2151 high-redshift submillimetre source candidates detected by Planck, including lensed galaxies and proto-cluster candidates, providing insights into early structure formation.
Contribution
The study introduces a novel component-separation method combining Planck and IRAS data to identify high-z submm sources over a large sky area.
Findings
Identification of 2151 high-z source candidates in 26% of the sky.
Discovery of a small fraction (~3%) of strongly lensed star-forming galaxies.
Most sources are overdensities of dusty galaxies, likely proto-clusters at z>2.
Abstract
The Planck mission, thanks to its large frequency range and all-sky coverage, has a unique potential for systematically detecting the brightest, and rarest, submillimetre sources on the sky, including distant objects in the high-redshift Universe traced by their dust emission. A novel method, based on a component-separation procedure using a combination of Planck and IRAS data, has been applied to select the most luminous cold submm sources with spectral energy distributions peaking between 353 and 857GHz at 5' resolution. A total of 2151 Planck high-z source candidates (the PHZ) have been detected in the cleanest 26% of the sky, with flux density at 545GHz above 500mJy. Embedded in the cosmic infrared background close to the confusion limit, these high-z candidates exhibit colder colours than their surroundings, consistent with redshifts z>2, assuming a dust temperature of 35K and a…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
