Identifying Student Difficulties with Entropy, Heat Engines, and the Carnot Cycle
Trevor I. Smith, Warren M. Christensen, Donald B. Mountcastle, and, John R. Thompson

TL;DR
This study investigates upper-division students' misconceptions about the Second Law of Thermodynamics, heat engines, and the Carnot cycle, revealing persistent difficulties in understanding and reasoning about thermodynamic concepts.
Contribution
It identifies specific student misconceptions in thermodynamics, highlighting the complexity of teaching heat engines and the Carnot cycle at the upper-division level.
Findings
Students struggle to connect the Carnot cycle with the Second Law.
Students have difficulty reasoning about physically impossible situations.
Misunderstandings include differentiating between differential and net changes.
Abstract
We report on several specific student difficulties regarding the Second Law of Thermodynamics in the context of heat engines within upper-division undergraduates thermal physics courses. Data come from ungraded written surveys, graded homework assignments, and videotaped classroom observations of tutorial activities. Written data show that students in these courses do not clearly articulate the connection between the Carnot cycle and the Second Law after lecture instruction. This result is consistent both within and across student populations. Observation data provide evidence for myriad difficulties related to entropy and heat engines, including students' struggles in reasoning about situations that are physically impossible and failures to differentiate between differential and net changes of state properties of a system. Results herein may be seen as the application of previously…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
