Welfare Maximization Entices Participation
Florian Brandl, Felix Brandt, Johannes Hofbauer

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that welfare-maximizing randomized mechanisms with optional participation inherently encourage participation, and characterizes voting rules satisfying Condorcet-consistency and participation, contrasting with deterministic rules.
Contribution
It establishes a fundamental link between welfare maximization and participation incentives in randomized mechanisms, extending to voting rules with new characterizations.
Findings
Welfare-maximizing mechanisms always entice participation.
The converse holds under additional assumptions.
A randomized voting rule satisfying Condorcet-consistency also entices participation.
Abstract
We consider randomized mechanisms with optional participation. Preferences over lotteries are modeled using skew-symmetric bilinear (SSB) utility functions, a generalization of classic von Neumann-Morgenstern utility functions. We show that every welfare-maximizing mechanism entices participation and that the converse holds under additional assumptions. Two important corollaries of our results are characterizations of an attractive randomized voting rule that satisfies Condorcet-consistency and entices participation. This stands in contrast to a well-known result by Moulin (1988), who proves that no deterministic voting rule can satisfy both properties simultaneously.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
