Could quantum mechanics describe completely and consistently all superconducting and other quantum phenomena?
A.V. Nikulov

TL;DR
This paper questions the completeness and consistency of quantum mechanics in describing superconducting and other quantum phenomena, highlighting contradictions and potential gaps in the canonical framework.
Contribution
It critically examines the canonical quantum description, revealing its incompleteness and inconsistencies across various quantum phenomena.
Findings
Identifies contradictions in the current quantum description of superconducting phenomena
Highlights gaps in the canonical quantum framework
Calls for a reevaluation of quantum theory foundations
Abstract
Canonical description of quantization effects observed at measurements on superconducting structures seems one of the most triumphant achievements of quantum mechanics. But impartial consideration uncovers incompleteness and inconsistency of this description. Contradictions in the description of other quantum phenomena are revealed also.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsQuantum Mechanics and Applications · Quantum Information and Cryptography · Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research
