Reversibility and the structure of the local state space
Sabri W. Al-Safi, Jonathan Richens

TL;DR
This paper investigates how reversibility constrains the structure of local and global state spaces in quantum and generalized theories, revealing that non-trivial reversible dynamics are limited to certain reducible or classical systems.
Contribution
It establishes conditions under which reversible dynamics are trivial or non-trivial, linking reversibility to the geometry and non-locality of state spaces in operational theories.
Findings
Reversible dynamics are trivial in maximally non-local theories with certain local state space properties.
Classical systems are uniquely capable of supporting non-trivial reversible dynamics among regular polytope state spaces.
Non-trivial reversible dynamics can exist in theories with reducible state spaces, but reversible entanglement generation remains impossible.
Abstract
The richness of quantum theory's reversible dynamics is one of its unique operational characteristics, with recent results suggesting deep links between the theory's reversible dynamics, its local state space and the degree of non-locality it permits. We explore the delicate interplay between these features, demonstrating that reversibility places strong constraints on both the local and global state space. Firstly, we show that reversible dynamics are trivial (composed of local transformations and permutations of subsytems) in maximally non-local theories whose local state spaces satisfy a dichotomy criterion; this applies to a range of operational models that have previously been studied, such as d-dimensional "hyperballs" and almost all regular polytope systems. By separately deriving a similar result for odd-sided polygons, we show that classical systems are the only regular…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
