The comparison of the 3-fluid dynamic model with experimental data
V. A. Kizka

TL;DR
This paper introduces a graphical comparison method for experimental data and theoretical models, applying it to the 3-fluid dynamic model in heavy-ion collisions across a wide energy range, revealing insights into fireball formation and QGP ignition.
Contribution
It develops a new methodology for comparing experimental data with theoretical models using sample grouping and graphical criteria, demonstrated on the 3-fluid dynamic model in heavy-ion collisions.
Findings
The 3-fluid dynamic model fits experimental data across energies 2.7-63 GeV.
Fireball formation can occur without quark-gluon plasma ignition at 63 GeV.
QGP ignition occurs via both first-order phase transition and crossover above 12 GeV.
Abstract
The article considers a way to compare large bulks of experimental data with theoretical calculations, in which the quality of theoretical models is clearly demonstrated graphically. The main idea of the method consists in grouping physical observables, represented by experiment and theoretical calculation, into samples, each of which characterizes a certain physical process. A further choice of a convenient criterion for comparing measurements and calculations, its calculation and averaging within each sample and then over all samples, makes it possible to choose the best theoretical model in the entire measurement area. Published theoretical data of the three-fluid dynamic model (3FD) applied to the experimental data from heavy-ion collisions at the energy range GeV are used as example of application of the developed methodology. When analyzing the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsHigh-Energy Particle Collisions Research
