Normalized Stokes operators for polarization correlations of entangled optical fields
Marek Zukowski, Wieslaw Laskowski, Marcin Wiesniak

TL;DR
This paper introduces normalized quantum Stokes operators to improve sensitivity in detecting polarization entanglement in optical fields, especially under intensity fluctuations, and presents a general method to derive entanglement indicators from any two-qubit witness.
Contribution
It proposes normalized Stokes operators that mitigate intensity fluctuation effects and develops a general framework for creating entanglement indicators from two-qubit witnesses.
Findings
Normalized Stokes operators enhance entanglement detection sensitivity.
The method removes effects of intensity fluctuations in polarization measurements.
A broad class of entanglement indicators can be derived from existing two-qubit witnesses.
Abstract
Stokes parameters are a standard tool in quantum optics. They involve averaged intensities at exits of polarizers. If the overall measured intensity fluctuates, as e.g. for states with undefined photon numbers, the instances of its increased value contribute more to the parameters. One can introduce normalized quantum Stokes operators. Operationally, for a given single run of the experiment, their values are differences of measured intensities (or photon numbers) at the two exits of a polarizer divided by their sum. Effects of intensity fluctuations are removed. Switching to normalized Stokes operators results in more sensitive entanglement conditions. We also show a general method of deriving an entanglement indicator for optical fields which use polarization correlations, which starts with any two-qubit entanglement witness. This allows to vastly expand the family of such indicators.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
