Mode mixing in sub- and trans-critical flows over an obstacle: When should Hawking's predictions be recovered?
Florent Michel, Renaud Parentani

TL;DR
This paper investigates how the flow parameter $F_{max}$ influences wave scattering and the emergence of Hawking-like radiation in shallow water flows over an obstacle, highlighting conditions for analogue Hawking predictions to hold.
Contribution
It identifies the critical role of $F_{max}$ in mode amplification and clarifies when Hawking's predictions are applicable in sub- and trans-critical flows.
Findings
Amplification is suppressed for $F_{max} < 1$
Enhanced low-frequency amplification occurs when $F_{max} oughly 1.1$
Observation of thermal mode conversion depends on obstacle steepness and width
Abstract
We reexamine the scattering coefficients of shallow water waves blocked by a stationary counter current over an obstacle. By considering series of background flows, we show that the most relevant parameter is , the maximal value of the ratio of the flow velocity over the speed of low frequency waves. For subcritical flows, i.e., , there is no analogue Killing horizon and the mode amplification is strongly suppressed. Instead, when , the amplification is enhanced at low frequency and the spectrum closely follows Hawking's prediction. We further study subcritical flows close to that used in the Vancouver experiment. Our numerical analysis suggests that their observation of the "thermal nature of the mode conversion" is due to the relatively steep slope on the upstream side and the narrowness of the obstacle.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
