
TL;DR
This paper reviews two approaches to noncommutative causality, comparing their mathematical frameworks and physical motivations using a specific Minkowski space example.
Contribution
It provides a comparative analysis of isocone-based and Lorentzian spectral triple frameworks for noncommutative causality.
Findings
Both frameworks are applied to the Minkowski plane with finite noncommutative space.
The paper highlights similarities and differences between the two approaches.
It clarifies the mathematical structures underlying noncommutative causality.
Abstract
We review the physical motivations and the mathematical results obtained so far in the isocone-based approach to noncommutative causality. We also give a briefer account of the alternative framework of Franco and Eckstein which is based on Lorentzian spectral triples. We compare the two theories on the simple example of the product geometry of the Minkowski plane by the finite noncommutative space with algebra .
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
