Horava Gravity in the Effective Field Theory formalism: from cosmology to observational constraints
Noemi Frusciante, Marco Raveri, Daniele Vernieri, Bin Hu, Alessandra, Silvestri

TL;DR
This paper maps Horava gravity into the effective field theory framework, analyzes its cosmological implications using updated data sets, and places tight observational constraints on its parameters, revealing significant effects on cosmological observables.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive mapping of Horava gravity into EFT, applies an advanced numerical tool to cosmology, and derives new observational bounds on the theory's parameters.
Findings
Tight upper bounds on deviations of gravitational constant from local measurements.
Significant impact on the Hubble rate and cosmological observables.
Quasi-static approximation is generally invalid for perturbation evolution.
Abstract
We consider Horava gravity within the framework of the effective field theory (EFT) of dark energy and modified gravity. We work out a complete mapping of the theory into the EFT language for an action including all the operators which are relevant for linear perturbations with up to sixth order spatial derivatives. We then employ an updated version of the EFTCAMB/EFTCosmoMC package to study the cosmology of the low-energy limit of Horava gravity and place constraints on its parameters using several cosmological data sets. In particular we use cosmic microwave background (CMB) temperature-temperature and lensing power spectra by Planck 2013, WMAP low-l polarization spectra, WiggleZ galaxy power spectrum, local Hubble measurements, Supernovae data from SNLS, SDSS and HST and the baryon acoustic oscillations measurements from BOSS, SDSS and 6dFGS. We get improved upper bounds, with…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
