Comparison of different moment-closure approximations for stochastic chemical kinetics
David Schnoerr, Guido Sanguinetti, Ramon Grima

TL;DR
This paper compares various moment-closure approximations for stochastic chemical kinetics, finding the normal closure generally performs better in terms of physical validity and applicability across different systems.
Contribution
The study systematically evaluates normal, Poisson, log-normal, and central-moment-neglect MAs on complex chemical systems, introducing the MOCA software for automated analysis.
Findings
Normal MA has a larger valid parameter space.
Predictions of all closures are similarly accurate within valid regions.
Poisson and log-normal MAs are not well-defined with conservation laws.
Abstract
In recent years moment-closure approximations (MA) of the chemical master equation have become a popular method for the study of stochastic effects in chemical reaction systems. Several different MA methods have been proposed and applied in the literature, but it remains unclear how they perform with respect to each other. In this paper we study the normal, Poisson, log-normal and central-moment-neglect MAs by applying them to understand the stochastic properties of chemical systems whose deterministic rate equations show the properties of bistability, ultrasensitivity and oscillatory behaviour. Our results suggest that the normal MA is favourable over the other studied MAs. In particular we found that (i) the size of the region of parameter space where a closure gives physically meaningful results, e.g. positive mean and variance, is considerably larger for the normal closure than for…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
