The Subaru FMOS Galaxy Redshift Survey (FastSound). III. The mass-metallicity relation and the fundamental metallicity relation at $z\sim1.4$
Kiyoto Yabe, Kouji Ohta, Masayuki Akiyama, Andrew Bunker, Gavin, Dalton, Richard Ellis, Karl Glazebrook, Tomotsugu Goto, Masatoshi Imanishi,, Fumihide Iwamuro, Hiroyuki Okada, Ikkoh Shimizu, Naruhisa Takato, Naoyuki, Tamura, Motonari Tonegawa, and Tomonori Totani

TL;DR
This study analyzes gas-phase metallicity and the mass-metallicity relation of approximately 4,000 galaxies at redshift 1.4 using near-infrared spectroscopy, revealing higher N/O ratios and deviations from local relations.
Contribution
It provides new measurements of metallicity, N/O ratios, and their relation to stellar mass at z~1.4, extending understanding of galaxy evolution at this epoch.
Findings
Mass-metallicity relation at z~1.4 agrees with previous studies.
No clear dependence of metallicity on star-formation rate.
N/O ratios are higher than local universe at fixed metallicity.
Abstract
We present the results from a large near-infrared spectroscopic survey with Subaru/FMOS (\textit{FastSound}) consisting of 4,000 galaxies at with significant H detection. We measure the gas-phase metallicity from the [N~{\sc ii}]6583/H emission line ratio of the composite spectra in various stellar mass and star-formation rate bins. The resulting mass-metallicity relation generally agrees with previous studies obtained in a similar redshift range to that of our sample. No clear dependence of the mass-metallicity relation with star-formation rate is found. Our result at is roughly in agreement with the fundamental metallicity relation at with fiber aperture corrected star-formation rate. We detect significant [S~{\sc ii}]6716,6731 emission lines from the composite spectra. The electron density estimated from…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
