Disentangling the Quantum World
Huw Price, Ken Wharton

TL;DR
This paper explores a retrocausal explanation for quantum entanglement, proposing a zigzag influence through lightcones that simplifies understanding of quantum correlations and challenges orthodox views.
Contribution
It introduces a new symmetry-based approach to justify Costa de Beauregard's zigzag model, offering a clearer explanation of quantum entanglement without action at a distance.
Findings
Shows how zigzag influences explain Bell correlations
Suggests entanglement is a feature of knowledge, not reality itself
Provides a simpler interpretation of quantum nonlocality
Abstract
Correlations related to related to quantum entanglement have convinced many physicists that there must be some at-a-distance connection between separated events, at the quantum level. In the late 1940s, however, O. Costa de Beauregard proposed that such correlations can be explained without action at a distance, so long as the influence takes a zigzag path, via the intersecting past lightcones of the events in question. Costa de Beauregard's proposal is related to what has come to be called the retrocausal loophole in Bell's Theorem, but -- like that loophole -- it receives little attention, and remains poorly understood. Here we propose a new way to explain and motivate the idea. We exploit some simple symmetries to show how Costa de Beauregard's zigzag needs to work, to explain the correlations at the core of Bell's Theorem. As a bonus, the explanation shows how entanglement might be…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
