Fine-tuning with Brane-Localized Flux in 6D Supergravity
Florian Niedermann, Robert Schneider

TL;DR
This paper critically examines a proposed mechanism in 6D supergravity models to address the cosmological constant problem, finding that only scale-invariant flux couplings can avoid fine-tuning, which challenges previous claims.
Contribution
It demonstrates that flux couplings preserving scale invariance are necessary for a flat 4D geometry, showing that the original mechanism does not work as intended without scale invariance breaking.
Findings
Scale-invariant flux coupling guarantees flat on-brane geometry.
Weinberg's fine-tuning argument applies unless scale invariance is broken.
Breaking scale invariance may allow tuning to be avoided, explored in a companion paper.
Abstract
There are claims in the literature that the cosmological constant problem could be solved in a braneworld model with two large (micron-sized) supersymmetric extra dimensions. The mechanism relies on two basic ingredients: First, the cosmological constant only curves the compact bulk geometry into a rugby shape while the 4D curvature stays flat. Second, a brane-localized flux term is introduced in order to circumvent Weinberg's fine-tuning argument, which otherwise enters here through a backdoor via the flux quantization condition. In this paper, we show that the latter mechanism does not work in the way it was designed: The only localized flux coupling that guarantees a flat on-brane geometry is one which preserves the scale invariance of the bulk theory. Consequently, Weinberg's argument applies, making a fine-tuning necessary again. The only remaining window of opportunity lies within…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
