Stochasticity & Predictability in Terrestrial Planet Formation
Volker Hoffmann, Simon L. Grimm, Ben Moore, Joachim Stadel

TL;DR
This study uses numerical simulations to demonstrate that terrestrial planet formation is highly chaotic, making individual system predictions unreliable, but allowing statistical insights into planetary system properties influenced by initial conditions and giant planet configurations.
Contribution
It reveals the chaotic nature of terrestrial planet formation and analyzes how initial conditions and giant planet orbits influence the resulting planetary systems, providing a statistical framework.
Findings
Chaotic evolution causes large variability in planetary configurations.
Giant planet eccentricity affects the number and mass of terrestrial planets.
Outer system edges are determined by the $ u_6$ resonance location.
Abstract
Terrestrial planets are thought to be the result of a vast number of gravitational interactions and collisions between smaller bodies. We use numerical simulations to show that practically identical initial conditions result in a wide array of final planetary configurations. This is a result of the chaotic evolution of trajectories which are highly sensitive to minuscule displacements. We determine that differences between systems evolved from virtually identical initial conditions can be larger than the differences between systems evolved from very different initial conditions. This implies that individual simulations lack predictive power. For example, there is not a reproducible mapping between the initial and final surface density profiles. However, some key global properties can still be extracted if the statistical spread across many simulations is considered. Based on these…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
