Spitzer Secondary Eclipse Observations of Five Cool Gas Giant Planets and Empirical Trends in Cool Planet Emission Spectra
Joshua A. Kammer, Heather A. Knutson, Michael R. Line, Jonathan J., Fortney, Drake Deming, Adam Burrows, Nicolas B. Cowan, Amaury H. M. J., Triaud, Eric Agol, Jean-Michel Desert, Benjamin J. Fulton, Andrew W. Howard,, Gregory P. Laughlin, Nikole K. Lewis, Caroline V. Morley

TL;DR
This study presents Spitzer secondary eclipse observations of five cool gas giant exoplanets, analyzing their emission spectra to understand atmospheric properties, metallicity, and circulation patterns, revealing mass-dependent spectral characteristics.
Contribution
First comprehensive emission spectra analysis of multiple cool gas giants, linking atmospheric features to planetary mass and metallicity with empirical trends.
Findings
Massive planets show low albedo and inefficient heat circulation.
Emission spectra suggest metallicity varies with planet mass.
Brightness temperature ratios are independent of temperature, possibly correlating with mass.
Abstract
In this work we present Spitzer 3.6 and 4.5 micron secondary eclipse observations of five new cool (<1200 K) transiting gas giant planets: HAT-P-19b, WASP-6b, WASP-10b, WASP-39b, and WASP-67b. We compare our measured eclipse depths to the predictions of a suite of atmosphere models and to eclipse depths for planets with previously published observations in order to constrain the temperature- and mass-dependent properties of gas giant planet atmospheres. We find that the dayside emission spectra of planets less massive than Jupiter require models with efficient circulation of energy to the night side and/or increased albedos, while those with masses greater than that of Jupiter are consistently best-matched by models with inefficient circulation and low albedos. At these relatively low temperatures we expect the atmospheric methane to CO ratio to vary as a function of metallicity, and we…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
