A Lattice Boltzmann study of the effects of viscoelasticity on droplet formation in microfluidic cross-junctions
Anupam Gupta, Mauro Sbragaglia

TL;DR
This study uses lattice Boltzmann simulations to explore how viscoelasticity in either the dispersed or continuous phase affects droplet formation in microfluidic cross-junctions, revealing that matrix viscoelasticity stabilizes and shifts the breakup point closer to the junction.
Contribution
It provides the first detailed analysis of viscoelastic effects on droplet breakup in microfluidic cross-junctions using mesoscale lattice Boltzmann simulations.
Findings
Viscoelasticity in the continuous phase stabilizes droplet breakup.
The breakup point shifts closer to the junction with increased matrix viscoelasticity.
Quantitative relationship between Deborah number and breakup location is established.
Abstract
Based on mesoscale lattice Boltzmann (LB) numerical simulations, we investigate the effects of viscoelasticity on the break-up of liquid threads in microfluidic cross-junctions, where droplets are formed by focusing a liquid thread of a dispersed (d) phase into another co-flowing continuous (c) immiscible phase. Working at small Capillary numbers, we investigate the effects of non-Newtonian phases in the transition from droplet formation at the cross-junction (DCJ) to droplet formation downstream of the cross-junction (DC) (Liu Zhang, , 082101 (2011)). We will analyze cases with (DV), where viscoelastic properties are confined in the dispersed phase, as well as cases with (MV), where viscoelastic properties are confined in the continuous phase. Moderate flow-rate ratios $Q \approx…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
