Autoionization of water: does it really occur?
V. G. Artemov, A. A. Volkov, N. N. Sysoev, A. A. Volkov

TL;DR
This paper proposes that high-frequency conductivity measurements reveal proton exchange dynamics in water rather than spontaneous ionization, challenging traditional views on water autoionization.
Contribution
It introduces a new approach to evaluate ion concentrations using high-frequency conductivity, suggesting water ionization is not spontaneous but driven by proton exchange.
Findings
High-frequency conductivity reflects proton exchange, not ionization.
Ion concentration c is temperature-independent.
Water molecule lifetime is less than a nanosecond.
Abstract
The ionization constant of water Kw is currently determined on the proton conductivity sigma1 which is measured at frequencies lower than 10^7 Hz. Here, we develop the idea that the high frequency conductivity sigma2 (~10^11 Hz), rather than sigma1 represents a net proton dynamics in water, to evaluate the actual concentration c of H3O+ and OH- ions from sigma2. We find c to be not dependent on temperature to conclude that i) water electrodynamics is due to a proton exchange between H3O+ (or OH-) ions and neutral H2O molecules rather than spontaneous ionization of H2O molecules, ii) the common Kw (or pH) reflects the thermoactivation of the H3O+ and OH- ions from the potential of their interaction, iii) the lifetime of a target water molecule does not exceed parts of nanosecond.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsSpectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies · Quantum, superfluid, helium dynamics · Protein Structure and Dynamics
