Capturing Multivariate Spatial Dependence: Model, Estimate and then Predict
Noel Cressie, Sandy Burden, Walter Davis, Pavel N. Krivitsky, Payam, Mokhtarian, Thomas Suesse, Andrew Zammit-Mangion

TL;DR
This paper discusses modeling multivariate spatial dependence to improve prediction of interacting physical processes, emphasizing the importance of valid covariance matrices for accurate multivariate field estimation.
Contribution
It introduces a framework for capturing and estimating multivariate spatial dependence, focusing on ensuring nonnegative definiteness of covariance matrices for better prediction.
Findings
Proposes a method for modeling multivariate spatial dependence
Ensures covariance matrices are nonnegative definite
Enhances prediction accuracy of multivariate fields
Abstract
Physical processes rarely occur in isolation, rather they influence and interact with one another. Thus, there is great benefit in modeling potential dependence between both spatial locations and different processes. It is the interaction between these two dependencies that is the focus of Genton and Kleiber's paper under discussion. We see the problem of ensuring that any multivariate spatial covariance matrix is nonnegative definite as important, but we also see it as a means to an end. That "end" is solving the scientific problem of predicting a multivariate field. [arXiv:1507.08017].
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
