Regions of Applicability of Approximate Formulations of Neutrino Oscillations in Matter
Mikkel B. Johnson, Ernest M. Henley, and Leonard S. Kisslinger

TL;DR
This paper assesses the accuracy of current approximate methods for neutrino oscillation predictions in matter, identifying their limitations and proposing improvements for future high-precision neutrino experiments.
Contribution
It provides a detailed comparison between approximate and exact neutrino oscillation probabilities, highlighting regions where existing methods can be refined.
Findings
Identifies regions where approximate methods deviate from exact results.
Highlights the impact of branch points on the reliability of approximations.
Suggests improvements for better analysis of future neutrino data.
Abstract
We examine the reliability of the theoretical methods presently used for analysis and prediction of neutrino oscillation phenomena. Of particular interest are the limitations imposed by branch points when expansions in one of the small parameters of the Standard Neutrino Model (SNM) are made to obtain tractable results. Our evaluation compares the approximate oscillation probabilities for flavor-changing transitions in the sector to exact results obtained from of a recently-developed exact analytical representation of neutrino oscillations in matter within the SNM. From our numerical comparisons, we are able to identify regions where the existing approaches can be improved to take full advantage of the higher quality data expected at future neutrino facilities.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsNeutrino Physics Research
