Interpreting the AXP 1E 2259+586 antiglitch as a change in internal magnetization
Alpha Mastrano, Arthur George Suvorov, and Andrew Melatos

TL;DR
This paper models the internal magnetic field decay in magnetars to explain the 2012 anti-glitch in AXP 1E 2259+586, revealing that complex magnetic configurations can produce larger anti-glitches with lower field decay.
Contribution
It introduces a self-consistent twisted torus magnetic field model in non-barotropic equilibrium, expanding understanding of magnetic field decay effects on anti-glitch phenomena.
Findings
Pure dipolar fields require larger toroidal decay for anti-glitch
Quadrupolar components lower the decay threshold needed
Predicted maximum anti-glitch sizes relate to ellipticity changes
Abstract
The sudden spin-down event ('anti-glitch') observed in AXP 1E 2259+586 on 2012 April 21 was arguably caused by a decay of its internal toroidal magnetic field component, which turns a stable prolate configuration into an unstable one. We refine previous models of this process by modelling the star's magnetic field self-consistently as a 'twisted torus' configuration in non-barotropic equilibrium (which allows us to explore a greater range of equilibrium configurations). It is shown that, if the star's magnetic field is purely dipolar, the change in the toroidal field strength required to produce an anti-glitch of the observed size can be ~ 10 times larger than previously calculated. If the star has a quadrupolar magnetic field component, then an anti-glitch of similar magnitude can be produced via a decay of the quadrupole component, in addition to a decay of the toroidal component. We…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
